Orthopaedics and Trauma
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 27-34 , February 2009

(iv) Surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty – pros and cons

References 

  1. Khan RJK, Fick D, Khoo P, et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty. Description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(7):1038–1046
  2. Meneghini RM, Smits SA, Swinford RR, Bahamonde RE. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 Suppl. 1):68–73
  3. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F, Bensafi H, Puget J. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement; early results. Int Orthopaedics. 2007;31:597–603
  4. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve postoperative outcomes: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701–710
  5. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 2007;89:1153–1160
  6. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Nayak N. The surgical approach to total hip arthroplasty: complications and utility of a modified direct lateral approach. Iowa Orthop J; 15: 48–61.
  7. Jacobs MA, Goytia RN, Bhargava T. Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach surgical description and early review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:38–44
  8. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:115–124
  9. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, Zatorski LE, Huo MH, Keggi KJ. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 2003;85:39–48
  10. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Symposium: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2235–2246
  11. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP. Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:63–67
  12. Pagnano M, Lewallen D, Hanssen A. Two-incision THA in 80 consecutive unselected patients: prevalence of complications. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting; February 23–27, 2005; Washington, DC. Course Number 144.
  13. Penenberg Brad L, Bolling W Seth, Riley Michelle. Percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (PATH): a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:209–220
  14. Duwelius PJ, Burkhart RL, Hayhurst JO, Moller H, Butler JBV. Comparison of the 2-incision and mini-incision posterior total hip arthroplasty technique, a Retrospective Match-Pair Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(1):48–56
  15. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach; two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 2008;[Epub ahead of print]
  16. Chen DW, Hu CC, Chang YH, Yang WE, Lee MS. Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach. A retrospective, case-controlled investigation with 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008;[Epub ahead of print]
  17. Archibeck MJ, White RE. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:232–238
  18. Williams SL, Bachison C, Michelson JD, Manner PA. Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(2):197–202
  19. Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:214–218
  20. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 2004;86:1353–1358
  21. Goldstein WM, Ali R, Murphy SI, et al. Patient priorities and importance of cosmesis after THA: standard versus minimal incision. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, February 23–27, 2005.

PII: S1877-1327(09)00012-8

doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2009.01.008

Orthopaedics and Trauma
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 27-34 , February 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution