| | (i) Initial resuscitation of the trauma victimAbstract The initial management of the trauma victim has evolved over many years. Changes have occurred in both pre-hospital and hospital practice and in the overall approach to patient management. The focus of patient care is now aimed at maintaining the patient's physiological state whilst obtaining an early CT scan of the head, spine and trunk to identify all injuries. However, in the critically ill patient with active bleeding the immediate surgical control of haemorrhage is essential. Recent developments in trauma management, including damage control resuscitation, more rapid imaging, improved methods of haemorrhage control and the identification of patients who would benefit from either early total care or damage control orthopaedics have all led to improved outcomes in the trauma patient. Introduction  Resuscitation of the trauma victim has evolved as new knowledge has become available over the years. Many of these advances in trauma management occur during times of war and the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have resulted in significant changes in the treatment of trauma away from the war zone. There is increased focus on the physiology of the trauma patient, attempting to identify problems at the earliest stage in order to prevent the development of derangement rather than reacting to its emergence. This has included changes in the timing and type of surgery in an attempt to limit additional physiological insults that can be attributed to the surgery. This review focuses on the management of the severely injured trauma victim, looking at the changes that have occurred in pre-hospital management, the major changes in haemorrhage control techniques, the concept of damage control resuscitation and the timing of surgery for the trauma victim. Pre-hospital care of the trauma victim  The management of the trauma victim at the scene has a major impact on the overall care of the patient. The focus of pre-hospital care of the trauma patient should be on a rapid primary assessment whilst maintaining a patent airway, immediate control of massive external haemorrhage, immobilization of the patient and rapid transfer to an appropriate trauma centre. All the above measures should be performed in such a way as to reduce the overall time spent at the scene of the injury so that the patient arrives at the trauma centre as quickly as possible. Another important aspect of pre-hospital care is early communication with the receiving hospital so that the trauma team can be assembled and present as the patient arrives. Changes in practice in pre-hospital care  Tourniquets Tourniquets are regularly used during transport from the scene of injury to the care facility in the military setting. In situations where haemorrhage control cannot be obtained with direct pressure, the application of a proximal tourniquet can be an effective method of haemorrhage control. The aim of tourniquet use in the pre-hospital setting is to control haemorrhage until the bleeding can be controlled in hospital, usually by surgical intervention. In the military setting, tourniquets are used with success in severely injured patients with major extremity vascular injury or traumatic amputation. A study by Beekley et al1 found that there was improved haemorrhage control in the above two patient groups and that tourniquet use (mean time 70 min) was not associated with neurological deficit or other adverse sequelae. Fluid resuscitation Previously, the initial management of hypovolaemia in the trauma patient involved the rapid administration of 2000 ml of Ringer's lactate as an initial fluid challenge. More recently, there have been changes in practice such that the initial fluid resuscitation of the patient is gauged by palpation of the radial pulse. Fluid boluses of up to 250 ml are given to maintain the radial pulse, as required. In general, the radial pulse is palpable when the systolic blood pressure is >70 mmHg, which is sufficient to maintain cerebral and myocardial perfusion in the short term. This is referred to as hypotensive resuscitation, or permissive hypotension, and is one of the components of damage control resuscitation. The use of small volumes of fluid avoids haemodilution and reduces the risk of coagulopathy. A lower systolic blood pressure will allow primary blood clots to form more easily and reduces the risk of secondary haemorrhage if the blood pressure rises before surgical control of the source of haemorrhage is obtained. Pelvic binders In trauma victims sustaining blunt trauma, bleeding from pelvic fractures can be difficult to evaluate clinically. The practice of testing pelvic stability for pelvic fractures has a low sensitivity and specificity and has the potential to increase bleeding by disrupting blood clots. It should not be performed. Splintage of unstable fractures reduces pain, decreases bleeding and prevents further soft tissue injury from movement of the fracture. It is now recommended that pelvic fractures, as well as long-bone fractures, are splinted prior to transport. For the pelvis, commercially available circumferential splints (pelvic binders) are now recommended pre-hospital for patients suspected to have severe pelvic fractures. Rapid transfer to major trauma centres In England and Wales, regional trauma networks are being developed and the first will become operational in London in April 2010. These networks of hospitals will work to agreed protocols with a hub and spoke system of Trauma Units, with peripheral District General Hospitals and a single, central, designated Major Trauma Centre. In many cases, triage criteria will allow direct transfer of the severely injured patient from the accident to the Major Trauma Centre, bypassing peripheral hospitals en route. Experience in other countries has shown that the development of Trauma Centres can reduce the mortality from trauma by 20% within the local population. However, the development of a Regional Trauma Network is more effective and reduces mortality by up to 40%. Multiple trauma is uncommon, with an incidence of about 1 per 10 000 urban population per year. The best outcome, in terms of mortality and morbidity, is achieved in specialist units that treat 500 or more patients with an injury severity score (ISS) of >15 per year. Thus it is likely that each regional network will require one Major Trauma Centre (providing all specialties on one site), per 5 million population. Initial assessment of the patient  On arrival in the emergency department, patients are assessed and treated based upon their priorities using the ATLS protocol.2 This involves a rapid primary survey with simultaneous resuscitation, followed by a more detailed secondary survey to identify all injuries and plan for definitive treatment. In certain situations the whole assessment may occur in the emergency department. In others, haemorrhage control may require emergency surgery, and transfer to the operating theatre will be part of the overall resuscitation and management as part of ‘circulation with haemorrhage control’. Primary survey2 A – Airway maintenance with spine protection This involves assessment of the trauma victim's airway looking for causes of obstruction, such as foreign bodies, and identifying fractures, soft tissue injuries and burns that may subsequently lead to airway obstruction. The airway must always be protected in patients with reduced level of consciousness. Whilst assessing the trauma victim's airway, the spine requires immobilization and protection. For the cervical spine, this may be by inline traction or by triple immobilization with collar, sandbags and tape. For the thoracic and lumbar spine, patients are initially immobilized on a spine board and movement of the spine avoided. B – Breathing and ventilation The assessment of breathing involves looking at the three key areas that are necessary for proper ventilation: the lungs, the chest wall and the diaphragm. Injuries to any of these can lead to impaired breathing and ventilation. Injuries that may be identified during this assessment include tension pneumothorax, flail chest with pulmonary contusions, massive haemothorax and open pneumothorax. C – Circulation with haemorrhage control Hypotension in the trauma victim should always be assumed to be due to bleeding until proven otherwise. A rapid clinical assessment of the patient's haemodynamic status can be performed by observing the level of consciousness, skin colour and the pulse rate. Whilst assessing the trauma victim's haemodynamic status, control of haemorrhage should also be performed. External bleeding can be controlled by direct pressure but severe limb bleeding, for example that associated with blast injury, may best be controlled by rapid application of a tourniquet. Severe pelvic fractures may result in massive, life-threatening haemorrhage. All movement of the pelvis should be avoided, as this can disrupt any blood clot that has formed and result in increased haemorrhage, which may be catastrophic. We recommend the rapid application of a pelvic binder in all victims of blunt trauma who have a reduction in systolic blood pressure (<110 mmHg). Examination for pelvic stability should not be performed. It provides no clinically useful information, is painful and potentially harmful. We would also recommend that the patient is not log-rolled (to examine the spine) until the pelvis has been cleared with a normal pelvic X-ray. An exception to the rule may be the victim of blast injuries where an early log roll may be necessary to identify penetrating, posterior wounds. The use of pelvic binders has become more common in emergency departments when managing patients with suspected pelvic fractures. A study by Croce et al3 compared their use with that of external pelvic fixation in patients with life-threatening pelvic fractures and found that the number of units of blood transfused at both 24 and 48 h was significantly reduced in patients with the binder. This may have been due to the fact that external fixators take more time to apply, thus allowing further bleeding, whereas the pelvic binder is quick to apply, splints the pelvis circumferentially and reduces the pelvic volume. Pelvic binders in this situation are useful intermediary devices before definitive internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures. There is no evidence that they increase damage in patients with lateral compression injuries. There are sporadic reports of pressure sores after their prolonged application and most authors recommend that they are released within 24–48 h of application, once the patient is haemodynamically stable. D – Disability A rapid assessment of the trauma victim's neurological status involves evaluation of the consciousness level (utilizing Glasgow Coma Score (GCS)), assessment of pupils and spinal cord injuries. A GCS below 8 must alert the attending physician to potential for airway compromise. E – Exposure/environmental control Assessment of the trauma victim requires full exposure of the patient in order to fully identify all injuries. During this stage, it is imperative that a reduction in body temperature is prevented by using external warming devices and warmed intravenous fluids. During the primary survey, X-rays of the chest and pelvis should be obtained rapidly to identify potentially life-threatening injuries that cannot be reliably diagnosed by clinical examination. Secondary survey2 The secondary survey consists of a head-to-toe evaluation of the patient to identify other injuries and guide further imaging. Modalities of imaging such as CT, ultrasound, echocardiogram or angiography may take place as part of the secondary survey in an attempt to identify injuries sustained. Haemorrhage control  In trauma victims there are two key goals for haemorrhage control: identify the source(s) of bleeding and then stop it (them). Recently, there have been developments in both areas that have improved the management of trauma victims. Identification of source of bleeding FAST scan (focused abdominal sonography for trauma): the use of ultrasound in the assessment of trauma victims started in Europe in the 1970s and since then, techniques have gradually improved. FAST scanning is a limited ultrasound scan of the trauma patient that takes place in the emergency room, as an adjunct to the primary survey. The FAST scan is used to look for the presence of free fluid in four regions; pericardium, perihepatic and hepato-renal space, perisplenic region and pelvis. It is useful for looking for free fluid. However, it is not accurate for identifying solid organ or bowel injuries. It provides a rapid assessment of the trauma victim: if there is free intraperitoneal fluid and the patient is haemodynamically unstable despite resuscitation, then it can lead to earlier laparotomy for haemorrhage control. A study by Rozycki et al4 looked at the use of FAST scan in 1540 patients (1227 blunt trauma, 313 penetrating injuries) and found an overall sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 99.3%. When evaluating patients with precordial or transthoracic wounds, FAST scans had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99.3%, and for hypotensive patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma, FAST scans had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Computed tomography (CT): the use of CT scanning in the management of the trauma victim is becoming more prevalent and is the imaging modality of choice for the haemodynamically stable patient. The time it takes to perform CT scans in trauma victims has decreased dramatically, firstly due to the development of faster scanners and secondly due to the location of the CT scanners within or close to most large emergency departments. CT scan for severe trauma should routinely use intravenous contrast and scan the patient from vertex to symphysis pubis. This allows the rapid identification of most significant head, spinal, thoracic, abdominal and pelvic injuries. This type of scan provides so much useful information in planning the immediate management of polytrauma, that many trauma centre protocols have changed to allow CT scans in patients with hypotension. It is essential that the trauma team accompanies the patient to the scanner, and in these circumstances, many departments will “routinely” scan patients with a systolic blood pressure of 70 mmHg or more. However, the CT suite is not the safest environment. The scan must be performed rapidly and the patient transferred to a place of safety as quickly as possible. Patients in extremis with a systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg should not be transferred to a CT suite, but a scan may be performed in departments that have a CT scanner in the emergency department. In the context of the haemodynamically unstable patient who has sustained blunt trauma, the initial investigation in the emergency department is a FAST scan to localize free fluid, as outlined above. However, in the haemodynamically stable patient use of CT is more appropriate. With the use of contrast-enhanced CT scanning, the ability to localize the site of contrast extravasation has been very important in the management of patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma. Yao et al5 looked at blunt abdominal trauma in 547 clinically stable patients and found that CT isolated a source of bleeding in 18% of the patients. This is important with regards to the treatment options of surgery, angiographic embolization or observation alone. CT is also useful for evaluation of the retroperitoneum. However, it is less sensitive for detection of injuries to hollow viscera.6 Pelvic angiography: for severe pelvic fractures, 90% of bleeding is related to venous injury and only 10% is due to arterial injury. However, the majority of unstable patients have arterial bleeding.7 In patients with venous bleeding, the bleeding may stop once the pressure within the retroperitoneal space and the venous pressure equalize. If the pelvic fracture is not reduced however, this can lead to enlargement of the retroperitoneal space and hence greater blood loss.7 Studies analyzing the success rate of angiographic embolization in haemodynamically unstable patients report success rates of up to 95%.8, 9 In cases where the bleeding cannot initially be controlled by selective angiographic embolization, then the use of temporary angiographic embolization of the internal iliac arteries bilaterally can be an option. Velhamos et al10 reported a 97% success rate using this technique in patients who had severe haemorrhage and did not respond to sub-selective embolization. It must be recognized than embolization of the internal arteries carries significant risks, such as infarction of the gluteal muscles with subsequent buttock necrosis. The alternative management strategy for uncontrolled haemorrhage from a severe pelvic fracture is pelvic packing. This is executed through the lower end of a mid-line laparotomy incision but it is essential that the packs are placed retroperitoneally, either side of the bladder neck, towards the sacrum and sacroiliac joints. In this situation, pelvic external fixation to give posterior mechanical stability is usually necessary and the pelvic C-clamp is probably the most effective device. Stopping bleeding  Damage control resuscitation Damage control resuscitation is a concept that has been developed during times of war in order to address the challenges of military trauma. The main thrust of damage control resuscitation involves two strategies; permissive hypotension and haemostatic resuscitation, and is subsequently followed by damage control surgery. The aim of damage control resuscitation is to correct the three components of the “lethal triad” that occur in trauma victims.11 The concept of damage control resuscitation is not just limited to management of the trauma victims in the emergency department. Depending on the state of the trauma victim, it is often continued into the operating room or into the intensive care unit. Lethal triad: the lethal triad is a term used to describe the combination of hypothermia, acute coagulopathy and acidosis that is found in the haemorrhaging trauma patient. The three aspects of the lethal triad are interlinked and the coagulopathy of trauma can be exacerbated by both acidosis and hypothermia. Acute coagulopathy: coagulopathy has been found to be associated with higher rates of mortality when present on admission to a trauma centre. Brohi et al12 demonstrated that an acute coagulopathy was present in 25% of trauma patients and that this was associated with an increase in mortality (45% versus 10% in patients without coagulopathy). Further research looking at individual markers of coagulopathy associated with increased rates of mortality has found that patients admitted with a raised prothrombin time have increased adjusted odds of death by 35% and patients with a raised partial thromboplastin time have an increased adjusted odds of death by 326%.13 The exact mechanisms by which coagulopathy develops in the trauma patient are still not fully understood, but have been shown to be multifactorial in nature. Previously, the acute coagulopathy was thought to be related to a combination of haemodilution, the by product of resuscitation, and hypothermia. A review of the mechanisms of the coagulopathy of trauma by Hess et al14 expanded on original ideas and isolated six key initiators of coagulopathy in trauma: tissue trauma, shock, haemodilution, hypothermia, acidaemia and inflammation. Between these six main initiators there is a large degree of interaction and cross-over. •Tissue trauma: Trauma to tissues results in endothelial damage. Firstly, this leads to exposure of tissue factor and initiation of the coagulation cascade. Secondly, hyperfibrinolysis occurs due to endothelial damage, resulting in release of tissue plasminogen activator. It is well recognized that multiple long-bone fractures and severe pelvic fractures are potent causes of coagulopathy. •Shock: Hypoperfusion of tissues leads to anaerobic metabolism, production of lactic acid and a metabolic acidosis, which affects coagulation. Shock also leads to ischaemia, which results in increased release of tissue plasminogen activator, thereby exacerbating hyperfibrinolysis. •Haemodilution: Haemodilution results from two mechanisms. Shock leads to reduced intravascular hydrostatic pressure and therefore a shift of fluid from extravascular to intravascular compartments, which will be depleted in coagulation factors resulting in haemodilution. In conjunction with this, fluid resuscitation of the trauma victim will also cause haemodilution due to lack of coagulation factors in resuscitation fluids. •Hypothermia: Hypothermia develops due to a combination of increased exposure, resuscitation with cold fluids and also the anaerobic metabolism of shock leading to decreased endogenous heat production. This has effects on both platelet activity (with activation essentially absent below 30 °C) and on plasma coagulation, with a significant reduction in function at temperatures below 34 °C. •Acidaemia: Acidaemia has been found to impair the function of plasma proteases and leads to increased breakdown of fibrinogen. However, if acidaemia is reversed with buffer solutions, coagulopathy still persists. This suggests a more complex mechanism for the development of coagulopathy than a simple change in pH. •Inflammation: Inflammation and coagulation pathways have a degree of cross-over and interaction, such that inflammation as a result of trauma can lead to derangements in coagulation. Trauma itself can induce inflammation and the presence of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in trauma patients is relatively common. Permissive hypotension: when managing trauma victims in haemorrhagic shock, the previous teaching was to aggressively resuscitate the patient with fluids in order to restore normal intravascular volumes and end-organ perfusion in an attempt to prevent cellular ischaemia and organ damage. The concept of permissive hypotension (also known as hypotensive resuscitation) is a different technique of resuscitation that is based on resuscitating the patient with fluids boluses, titrating the boluses to a lower than normal blood pressure (or radial pulse in pre-hospital care) in an attempt to preserve any clots that have formed and prevent further blood loss. This is continued until haemorrhage has been controlled, a period of decreased end-organ perfusion being accepted as a potential consequence.11 Once haemorrhage has been controlled, then a return to normal vital parameters and organ perfusion is required. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has issued guidance on permissive hypotensive resuscitation for the pre-hospital care of trauma victims, recommending that intravenous fluids should not be given if a radial pulse is palpable. If the radial pulse is not palpable, then fluid boluses up to 250 ml should be given and the pulse re-assessed.15 The use of hypotensive resuscitation is limited to trauma victims without associated head injuries. In patients with associated head injuries, the importance of maintaining cerebral perfusion is well documented and permissive hypotension is contraindicated in this group of patients.11 Haemostatic resuscitation: the concept of haemostatic resuscitation has been developed in an attempt to treat the acute coagulopathy of trauma victims and also to reduce the dilutional coagulopathy that can develop with conventional resuscitation. It involves the early use of red blood cells, plasma and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio as the primary resuscitation fluids.11 The main features of this are outlined later in the section on massive transfusion protocols. Prevention of hypothermia: hypothermia results from a combination of increased exposure, the administration of cold fluids and decreased endogenous heat production due to anaerobic metabolism. Whilst managing the trauma victim, prevention of hypothermia is much easier than reversal of hypothermia. Guidelines for management of peri-operative hypothermia have been set out by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, which recommend reduced exposure of the patient, use of forced air warming devices and warming of all blood products and intravenous fluids to 37 °C.16 Other intra-operative methods of reducing hypothermia include use of carbon polymer heating mattresses.11 Adequacy of resuscitation: monitoring the effectiveness of resuscitation of the trauma patient is of paramount importance in the early stages of patient care. Whilst vital parameters such as blood pressure, heart rate and urine output are very useful for monitoring the response to fluid resuscitation, they do not always reflect tissue perfusion. If cells are not receiving enough oxygen, there will be increased levels of anaerobic respiration leading to increased levels of lactic acid. This has led to the concept of occult hypoperfusion (OH). OH is usually monitored by the level of lactate in the blood, with a lactate >2.5 mmol/l despite normal vital parameters (heart rate <120 bpm, systolic BP >100 mmHg, urine output >1 ml/kg/h) constituting occult hypoperfusion.17 In patients where the blood pressure, heart rate or urine output are outside of the range outlined above, then the hypoperfusion is not considered to be “occult”. A study by Blow et al17 looked at measurement of lactic acid in trauma victims with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥20 who were haemodynamically stable. The authors found patients who had occult hypoperfusion on admission that was corrected by 24 h had a 100% survival. If the occult hypoperfusion continued beyond 24 h, the mortality rate was 43%. In this group there was also a significantly higher rate of multi-system organ failure and respiratory complications in comparison to groups where the occult hypoperfusion was corrected within 24 h. It has also been demonstrated that patients who undergo fixation of femoral fractures within 24 h and before correction of occult hypoperfusion have a two-fold increase in post-operative complications (acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-system organ failure, respiratory complications, infections, deep vein thrombosis).18 Massive transfusion protocols  The concept of massive transfusion protocols links into damage control resuscitation. The practice has been developed over recent years and has gained popularity. A survey conducted in 25 countries found that 45% used a massive transfusion protocol, 34% did not use a massive transfusion protocol and 19% reported inconsistent use of a protocol.19 The concept behind massive transfusion protocols is simple: lost whole blood should be replaced with whole blood. Red blood cells, plasma and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio are effectively reconstituted whole blood and therefore transfusion of individual components in this ratio is the equivalent of whole blood replacement. Resuscitation with crystalloid, colloid or red blood cells alone can result in haemodilution and coagulopathy. Brohi et al12 demonstrated that an acute coagulopathy was present in 25% of trauma patients and that this was associated with an increase in mortality compared to patients without a coagulopathy. Massive transfusion protocols attempt to correct or prevent the development of coagulopathy in trauma victims. A study by Holcomb et al20 found that trauma patients who were transfused high plasma to red blood cell ratios and high platelet to red blood cell ratios had increased 24 h and 30 days survival with decreased intensive care unit times and decreased time on a ventilator. The utilization of a massive transfusion protocol is not without risk and should only be used in patients in haemorrhagic shock or at high risk of requiring a massive transfusion (≥10 units in 24 h). The risks associated with plasma and platelet transfusion, although low, should be taken into consideration when initiating a massive transfusion protocol. Fresh frozen plasma transfusions have been associated with increased risks of transfusion-transmitted viral infections, transfusion-related acute lung injury, acute allergic and anaphylactic reactions, haemolysis and the consequences of fluid overload.21 Platelet transfusions contain approximately 300 ml of plasma and as such entail the same risks as a plasma transfusion but with additional risks from the platelet component of bacterial contamination (since platelets are stored at 22 °C which could promote bacterial growth if contaminated) and primary cytomegalovirus infection.21 Areas of development in massive transfusion protocols  Young versus old red blood cells The age and length of storage of red blood cells have been shown to affect the outcome of trauma patients. A review by Vandromme et al22 discusses the mechanisms by which red blood cells are altered by storage. After storage of whole blood for 14 days, there is an accumulation of glycolytic metabolism byproducts, which results in functional and structural changes to red blood cells such that they are less pliable and therefore less able to reach end-organ capillary beds, leading to decreased oxygen delivery. After two weeks of storage, levels of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) decrease in stored red blood cells, leading to reduced affinity of haemoglobin for oxygen and hence less oxygen delivery to the end organs per unit of haemoglobin. These levels of 2,3-DPG can take up to 72 h to recover after transfusion, which results in a delay in the overall effectiveness of the red blood cells in the initial phases. Various studies have been performed looking at the effects of young versus old red blood cell transfusions in trauma patients. These studies are limited by the fact that they are reporting the effects after evaluating patients who have received a mixture of young (<14 days) and old (>14 days) transfusions, and also the effect of the volume of red blood cells transfused is not insignificant. Weinberg et al23 investigated the effect of young versus old blood transfusions on trauma victims (mean ISS 26) and found that in patients who received three or more units of old red blood cells, there was a greater than two-fold increase in the odds of death. A further study by Weinberg et al24 found that in patients with less severe blunt trauma (ISS <25) there was an independent association with risk of death, acute renal failure and pneumonia in patients receiving old red blood cells. Calcium Calcium is one of the co-factors that plays a role in the coagulation cascade. A study by Cherry et al25 found that trauma patients with an ionized calcium <1.0 mmol/l on admission had a significantly higher mortality compared to patients with an ionized calcium >1.0 mmol/l (26.4% versus 16.7% respectively). Patients who undergo transfusion are also at risk of exacerbation of hypocalcaemia. Citrate is used as one of the anticoagulants in some blood components, and it chelates calcium which can lower serum ionized calcium. A review by Lier et al26 recommends maintaining an ionized calcium concentration ≥0.9 mmol/l in an attempt to reduce the risk of exacerbation of coagulopathy. Recombinant factor VIIa (rfVIIa) Factor VIIa plays an important role in the coagulation cascade and the theoretical ability of rfVIIa to reduce bleeding has led to many studies of its use. RfVIIa is currently only licensed for use in haemophilia patients with inhibitory allo-antibodies. A study by Boffard et al27 found a significant reduction in red cell unit requirements over a 48 h period after administration of rfVIIa in patients who had sustained blunt trauma. A Cochrane review28 of 13 randomized controlled trials of rfVIIa use in both prophylactic and therapeutic settings to reduce bleeding found no reliable evidence of an advantage of rfVIIa over placebo, though there was a trend to a decrease in mortality with rfVIIa use. It also found a trend towards an increased incidence of thromboembolic disease after the use of rfVIIa although again this was non-significant. Concerns regarding these complications have lead to a recent restriction in using rfVIIa by the military. Timing of surgery  The timing of surgery in patients who have sustained multiple injuries has changed in practice over the years. Prior to the 1950s stabilization of long-bone fractures was not performed because it was considered that the patient was unable to tolerate the physiological insult of a long surgical procedure.29 The patient was considered “too sick for surgery”. The disadvantages of delayed fixation of fractures are numerous. It results in prolonged bed rest with increased risk of decubitus ulcers, pneumonia and thromboembolic events and also makes nursing care more complex.30 In 1989, Bone et al31 performed a study investigating the outcomes of early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures. This study found that in femoral fractures in multiply injured patients, early stabilization of the fractures lead to a lower incidence of pulmonary complications and shorter duration of stay in both the intensive care unit and also in hospital. This led to the evolution of the idea of early total care for patients with multiple injuries where the fractures were definitively stabilized earlier and at the same time. Immediate fixation of fractures became the norm. Following the change in management plans towards early total care, it became apparent that in certain subgroups of polytrauma victims, the use of early total care resulted in increased biochemical and inflammatory responses resulting in a higher incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome and organ dysfunction. In these situations, the physiological insult of early surgery outweighed the benefits of early fixation. Morshed et al32 performed a study looking at timing of definitive fixation of femoral fractures in 3069 polytrauma patients with an ISS ≥15. The authors found that delayed definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures by greater than 12 h was associated with a reduction in mortality of approximately 50%, and that patients with associated severe abdominal trauma benefited most from delayed fixation. The concept of damage control surgery was a development for the management of patients with severe abdominal haemorrhage due to penetrating injury. In 1993, Rotondo et al33 published a paper which compartmentalized the process of damage control surgery. This involved initial laparotomy, control of haemorrhage and contamination and abdominal packing and rapid closure. The patient was then transferred to the intensive care for resuscitation to return the patient to a physiologically normal state, and only once this was achieved, the patient taken back to theatre for re-exploration. Damage control orthopaedics  Damage control orthopaedics evolved from damage control surgery to improve the care of the severely injured, unstable trauma victim. It involves initial temporary stabilization of fractures with control of haemorrhage and decompressive surgery if required, followed by transfer to the intensive care setting for continued resuscitation. Once physiologically normal, the patient would then be taken to theatre for definitive stabilization of their injuries.29 The premise of damage control orthopaedics is based around the physiology of the patient and the idea of the two-hit hypothesis. The first hit is the injury that the trauma victim sustained which activates a systemic inflammatory response, but also makes the patient vulnerable to a second insult. The second hit is the surgery for the patient, which can augment the systemic inflammatory response leading to increased risk of multi-organ failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome.34 The most common technique for temporary stabilization of either long-bone fractures or pelvic fractures is external fixation, since it can be applied in a relatively expedient manner. This reduces operating time, so enables the patient to have their fractures stabilized whilst returning them to the intensive care setting for continued resuscitation as quickly as possible. Following this, the patient can undergo conversion of temporary fixation to definitive fixation. The timing of when the patient should undergo conversion to intramedullary nailing is another factor that can affect outcome. Pape et al35 performed a prospective cohort study looking at the time of conversion from external fixation to definitive fixation and the effects in terms of both biochemical markers and clinical outcomes. The authors found that if patients had their conversion to definitive surgery within two and four days of injury, compared to five to eight days after injury, there was a higher incidence of post-operative organ dysfunction (46.5% and 15.7% respectively). The authors concluded that there was no clinical advantage to performing conversion to definitive surgery until after the fourth day. Staging patients in polytrauma  When managing trauma patients, it is often a complex decision as to whether to manage the patient by early total care or proceed with damage control surgery. A review by Pape et al30 categorized polytrauma patients into four groups; stable, borderline, unstable and in extremis. These categories were delineated by the use of four main parameters (shock, coagulation, temperature and soft tissue injuries) and the degree of physiological abnormality and injury within these criteria and are shown in Table 1. The groups are summarized below: •Stable: In this patient group, early fixation of fractures is acceptable.30 Definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures should generally be delayed by 12 h in patients with an injury severity score ≥15.32 •Borderline: This group requires close monitoring with a multi-disciplinary approach. If the patient responds to initial resuscitation, then definitive surgery less than 2 h in length can be performed depending on their physiological parameters intra-operatively. If physiological parameters become deranged intra-operatively, then temporary fixation is advised.30 •Unstable: Life and limb saving procedures should be performed initially with temporary fixation of major lower extremity injuries. Depending on the physiological parameters and associated injuries, either definitive fixation or temporary fixation of femoral fractures may be appropriate.30 •In extremis: The control of haemorrhage is the primary concern in this group followed by restoration of physiological abnormalities in the intensive care setting, with fractures being a second agenda. Damage control surgery with temporary fixation of fractures is appropriate.30 Summary  The management of the trauma victim has evolved, and continues to evolve with time. Recent changes take effect in the pre-hospital setting, emergency department and operating theatre. Important changes within the pre-hospital setting include the use of hypotensive resuscitation, using the radial pulse as a guide, the use of pelvic binders, tourniquets and the development of trauma centres. In the emergency department itself, the development of damage control resuscitation with increasing understanding of trauma physiology plays a critical role, along with improving accuracy, availability and rapidity of imaging methods. The surgeon's role has also evolved, again taking account of new knowledge of trauma physiology to ensure that the patient undergoes the most appropriate surgery at the most appropriate time. Overall, the management of the trauma victim has developed into a multi-disciplinary specialty effort to ensure that the patient receives correct initial management combined with appropriately timed surgery to preserve the patient's physiology and improve outcome. References  1. 1Beekley AC, Sebesta JA, Blackbourne LH, et al. Prehospital tourniquet use in operation Iraqi freedom: effect on haemorrhage control and outcomes. J Trauma. 2008;64:S28–S37. 2. 2Am Coll of Surgeons. ATLS student course manual, 8th edn. Chicago, IL: 2008. 3. 3Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Savage SA, Wood GW, Fabian TC. Emergent pelvic fixation in patients with exsanguinating pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:935–942. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (138 KB)
|
CrossRef
4. 4Rozycki GS, Ballard RB, Feliciano DV, Schmidt JA, Pennington SD. Surgeon performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries: lessons learned from 1540 patients. Ann Surg. 1998;228:557–567. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
5. 5Yao DC, Jeffrey RB, Mirvis SE, et al. Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:17–20. 6. 6Jansen JO, Yule SR, Loudon MA. Investigation of blunt abdominal trauma. BMJ. 2008;336:938–942. 7. 7Geeraerts T, Chhor V, Cheisson G, et al. Initial management of blunt pelvic trauma patients with haemodynamic instability. Crit Care. 2007;11:204.
CrossRef
8. 8Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Vassiliu P, et al. A prospective study on the safety and efficacy of angiographic embolization for pelvic and visceral injuries. J Trauma. 2002;53:303–308. MEDLINE 9. 9Fangio P, Asehnoune K, Edouard A, Smail N, Benhamou D. Early embolization and vasopressor administration for management of life-threatening hemorrhage from pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2005;58:978–984. MEDLINE 10. 10Velhamos GC, Chahwan S, Hanks SE, et al. Angiographic embolization of bilateral internal iliac arteries to control life-threatening hemorrhage after blunt trauma to the pelvis. Am Surg. 2000;66:858–862. MEDLINE 11. 11Jansen JO, Thomas R, Loudon MA, Brooks A. Damage control resuscitation for patients with major trauma. BMJ. 2009;338:1436–1440. 12. 12Brohi K, Singh J, Heron M, Coats T. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2003;54:1127–1130. 13. 13MacLeod JB, Lynn M, McKenney MG, Cohn SM, Murtha M. Early coagulopathy predicts mortality in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;55:39–44. MEDLINE 14. 14Hess JR, Brohi K, Dutton RP, et al. The coagulopathy of trauma: a review of mechanisms. J Trauma. 2008;65:748–754. 15. 15National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance 74. Pre-hospital initiation of fluid replacement therapy in trauma. London: 2004. 16. 16National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Clinical practice guideline: the management of inadvertent hypothermia in adults. London: 2008. 17. 17Blow O, Magliore L, Claridge JA, Butler K, Young JS. The golden hour and the silver day: detection and correction of occult hypoperfusion within 24 hours improves outcomes from major trauma. J Trauma. 1999;47:964–969. MEDLINE 18. 18Crowl AC, Young JS, Kahler DM, Claridge JA, Chrzanowski DS, Pomphrey M. Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing early femur fracture fixation. J Trauma. 2000;48:260–267. 19. 19Hoyt DB, Dutton RB, Hauser CJ, et al. Management of coagulopathy in the patients with multiple injuries: results from an international survey of clinical practice. J Trauma. 2006;60:S59–S69. MEDLINE 20. 20Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Michaelk JE, et al. Increased plasma and platelet to red blood cell ratios improves outcome in 466 massively transfused civilian trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2008;248:447–458. 21. 21Maclennan S, Williamson LM. Risks of fresh frozen plasma and platelets. J Trauma. 2006;60:S46–S50. MEDLINE 22. 22Vandromme MJ, McGwin G, Weinberg JA. Blood transfusion in the critically ill: does storage age matter?. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009; 13;17:35. 23. 23Weinberg JA, McGwin G, Griffin RL, et al. Age of transfused blood: an independent predictor of mortality despite universal leukoreduction. J Trauma. 2008;65:279–282. 24. 24Weinberg JA, McGwin G, Marques MB, et al. Transfusion in the less severely injured: does age of transfused blood affect outcomes?. J Trauma. 2008;65:794–798. 25. 25Cherry RA, Bradburn E, Carney DE, Shaffer ML, Gabbay RA, Cooney RN. Do early ionized calcium levels really matter in trauma patients?. J Trauma. 2006;61:774–779. MEDLINE 26. 26Lier H, Krep H, Schroeder S, Stuber F. Preconditions of hemostasis in trauma: a review. The influence of acidosis, hypocalcaemia, anemia and hypothermia on functional hemostasis in trauma. J Trauma. 2008;65:951–960. 27. 27Boffard KD, Riou B, Warren B, et al. Recombinant factor VIIa as adjunctive therapy for bleeding control in severely injured trauma patients: two parallel randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials. J Trauma. 2005;59:8–15. MEDLINE 28. 28Stanworth S, Birchall J, Doree C, Hyde C. Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:. 29. 29Gionnoudis PV. Aspects of current management; surgical priorities in damage control in polytrauma. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2003;85-B:478–483. 30. 30Pape HC, Tornetta P, Tarkin I, Tzioupis C, Sebeson V, Olson SA. Timing of fracture fixation in multitrauma patients: the role of early total care and damage control surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:541–549. 31. 31Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R. Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1989;71-A:336–340. 32. 32Morshed S, Miclau T, Bembom O, Cohen M, Knudson MM, Colford JM. Delayed internal fixation of femoral shaft fractures reduces mortality among patients with multisystem trauma. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2009;91:3–13.
CrossRef
33. 33Rotondo M, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:375–382. MEDLINE 34. 34Giannoudis PV, Smith RM, Bellamy MC, Morrison JF, Dickson RA, Guillou PJ. Stimulation of the inflammatory system by reamed and undreamed nailing of femoral fractures. An analysis of the second hit. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1999;81-B:356–361. 35. 35Pape HC, van Griensven M, Rice J, et al. Major secondary surgery in blunt trauma patients and perioperative cytokine liberation: determination of the clinical relevance of biochemical markers. J Trauma. 2001;50:989–1000. MEDLINE Nicholas S Duncan MRCS (Ed) BM BS Specialist Registrar in Trauma and Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Department, Nottingham University Hospital, United Kingdom Chris Moran MD FRCS Professor of Orthopaedic Trauma, Orthopaedic Department, Nottingham University Hospital, United Kingdom PII: S1877-1327(09)00195-X doi:10.1016/j.mporth.2009.12.003 © 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. | |
|